You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
A mathematical model for meat cooking
The European Physical Journal Plus, March 2020
H. Nelson, S. Deyo, S. Granzier-Nakajima, P. Puente, K. Tully, J. Webb
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of||1||9%|
|Members of the public||9||82%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||9||28%|
|Student > Master||6||19%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||9%|
|Student > Postgraduate||3||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||16%|
|Physics and Astronomy||3||9%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2021.
All research outputs
of 24,884,310 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal Plus
of 1,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 372,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal Plus
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,884,310 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.